Evaluation - Spring 2017 Regional Meetings - Copy

Thank you for your help in making the Making it Better Regional meetings a success. Please complete the following evaluation to help MDH better plan for upcoming trainings and technical assistance opportunities.

Which Regional Meeting did you attend?

1. Southeast, April 10, Rochester
2. Northwest, April 13, Bemidji
3. Northeast, April 20, Duluth
4. Southwest, April 27, Redwood Falls
5. Metro, May 4, St. Paul
6. Central, May 11, St. Joseph

How would you rate the following:

Topics	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent	N/A
Understanding the Health Equity Data Analysis (HEDA) process	Understanding the Health Equity Data Analysis (HEDA) process, Poor	Understanding the Health Equity Data Analysis (HEDA) process, Fair	Understanding the Health Equity Data Analysis (HEDA) process, Good	Understanding the Health Equity Data Analysis (HEDA) process, Excellent	Understanding the Health Equity Data Analysis (HEDA) process, N/A
Knowledge and expanded my idea of community engagement and public narrative around health	Knowledge and expanded my idea of community engagement and public narrative around health, Poor	Knowledge and expanded my idea of community engagement and public narrative around health, Fair	Knowledge and expanded my idea of community engagement and public narrative around health, Good	Knowledge and expanded my idea of community engagement and public narrative around health, Excellent	Knowledge and expanded my idea of community engagement and public narrative around health, N/A
Awareness of training plans and technical assistance support for HEDA	Awareness of training plans and technical assistance support for HEDA, Poor	Awareness of training plans and technical assistance support for HEDA, Fair	Awareness of training plans and technical assistance support for HEDA, Good	Awareness of training plans and technical assistance support for HEDA, Excellent	Awareness of training plans and technical assistance support for HEDA, N/A
Reviewed and identified gaps and areas of improvement for school wellness policies	Reviewed and identified gaps and areas of improvement for school wellness policies, Poor	Reviewed and identified gaps and areas of improvement for school wellness policies, Fair	Reviewed and identified gaps and areas of improvement for school wellness policies, Good	Reviewed and identified gaps and areas of improvement for school wellness policies, Excellent	Reviewed and identified gaps and areas of improvement for school wellness policies, N/A
Problem solved current school SHIP issues	Problem solved current school SHIP issues, Poor	Problem solved current school SHIP issues, Fair	Problem solved current school SHIP issues, Good	Problem solved current school SHIP issues, Excellent	Problem solved current school SHIP issues, N/A
Overview of the School Health Index and how it links to SHIP action planning	Overview of the School Health Index and how it links to SHIP action planning, Poor	Overview of the School Health Index and how it links to SHIP action planning, Fair	Overview of the School Health Index and how it links to SHIP action planning, Good	Overview of the School Health Index and how it links to SHIP action planning, Excellent	Overview of the School Health Index and how it links to SHIP action planning, N/A
Networking opportunities	Networking opportunities, Poor	Networking opportunities, Fair	Networking opportunities, Good	Networking opportunities, Excellent	Networking opportunities, N/A

Overall, did the Regional Meeting:

1. Fall below your expectations
2. Meet your expectations
3. Exceed your expectations

What was the most valuable part of the Regional Meeting?

What was the least valuable part?

What SHIP topics, settings/strategies, or skills would you like addressed in the future?