Evaluation - 2017 Making it Better Regional Meetings - Feb.

Thank you for your help in making the Making it Better Regional meetings a success. Please complete the following evaluation to help MDH better plan for upcoming trainings and technical assistance opportunities.

Which Regional Meeting did you attend?

1. Feb. 1 -- Northeast GrandRapids
2. Feb. 3 -- Metro Dakota County
3. Feb. 9 -- Northwest Bemidji
4. Feb. 16 -- Southwest Redwood Falls
5. Mar. 2 -- Southeast Rochester

How would you describe the following overall aspects of the workshop?

Topics	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Workshop content	Workshop content, Poor	Workshop content, Fair	Workshop content, Good	Workshop content, Excellent
Hands-on activities	Hands-on activities, Poor	Hands-on activities, Fair	Hands-on activities, Good	Hands-on activities, Excellent
Networking opportunities	Networking opportunities, Poor	Networking opportunities, Fair	Networking opportunities, Good	Networking opportunities, Excellent

How would you rate the following:

Topics	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
SHIP Community Specialist and Evaluation Updates	SHIP Community Specialist and Evaluation Updates, Poor	SHIP Community Specialist and Evaluation Updates, Fair	SHIP Community Specialist and Evaluation Updates, Good	SHIP Community Specialist and Evaluation Updates, Excellent
Media Relations Training	Media Relations Training, Poor	Media Relations Training, Fair	Media Relations Training, Good	Media Relations Training, Excellent
Active Living Comprehensive Planning	Active Living Comprehensive Planning, Poor	Active Living Comprehensive Planning, Fair	Active Living Comprehensive Planning, Good	Active Living Comprehensive Planning, Excellent
MN Walks Overview	MN Walks Overview, Poor	MN Walks Overview, Fair	MN Walks Overview, Good	MN Walks Overview, Excellent

Please rate how well the workshop addressed the following:

Topics	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Gained knowledge about effective communications outreach and types of media.	Gained knowledge about effective communications outreach and types of media., Poor	Gained knowledge about effective communications outreach and types of media., Fair	Gained knowledge about effective communications outreach and types of media., Good	Gained knowledge about effective communications outreach and types of media., Excellent
Learned some basic rules for working and interacting with the news media.	Learned some basic rules for working and interacting with the news media., Poor	Learned some basic rules for working and interacting with the news media., Fair	Learned some basic rules for working and interacting with the news media., Good	Learned some basic rules for working and interacting with the news media., Excellent
Developed skills for creating successful communications campaigns.	Developed skills for creating successful communications campaigns., Poor	Developed skills for creating successful communications campaigns., Fair	Developed skills for creating successful communications campaigns., Good	Developed skills for creating successful communications campaigns., Excellent
Learned how to use effective storytelling to enhance messages.	Learned how to use effective storytelling to enhance messages., Poor	Learned how to use effective storytelling to enhance messages., Fair	Learned how to use effective storytelling to enhance messages., Good	Learned how to use effective storytelling to enhance messages., Excellent
Acquired a working understanding of effective and ineffective messengers.	Acquired a working understanding of effective and ineffective messengers., Poor	Acquired a working understanding of effective and ineffective messengers., Fair	Acquired a working understanding of effective and ineffective messengers., Good	Acquired a working understanding of effective and ineffective messengers., Excellent
Reviewed news releases, news advisories, letters to the editor and op-eds.	Reviewed news releases, news advisories, letters to the editor and op-eds., Poor	Reviewed news releases, news advisories, letters to the editor and op-eds., Fair	Reviewed news releases, news advisories, letters to the editor and op-eds., Good	Reviewed news releases, news advisories, letters to the editor and op-eds., Excellent
Understanding the role of public health in comprehensive planning process.	Understanding the role of public health in comprehensive planning process., Poor	Understanding the role of public health in comprehensive planning process., Fair	Understanding the role of public health in comprehensive planning process., Good	Understanding the role of public health in comprehensive planning process., Excellent
Learned about technical assistance resources available for public health professionals to integrate into the comprehensive planning process.	Learned about technical assistance resources available for public health professionals to integrate into the comprehensive planning process., Poor	Learned about technical assistance resources available for public health professionals to integrate into the comprehensive planning process., Fair	Learned about technical assistance resources available for public health professionals to integrate into the comprehensive planning process., Good	Learned about technical assistance resources available for public health professionals to integrate into the comprehensive planning process., Excellent
Understanding how Minnesota Walks can be used as a tool to increase local action for SHIP active living strategies.	Understanding how Minnesota Walks can be used as a tool to increase local action for SHIP active living strategies., Poor	Understanding how Minnesota Walks can be used as a tool to increase local action for SHIP active living strategies., Fair	Understanding how Minnesota Walks can be used as a tool to increase local action for SHIP active living strategies., Good	Understanding how Minnesota Walks can be used as a tool to increase local action for SHIP active living strategies., Excellent

Do you have a technical assistance need?

1. No
2. Yes, explain ta needed Please specify

Overall, did the Regional Meeting:

1. Fall below your expectations
2. Meet your expectations
3. Exceed your expectations

Did you leave the Regional Meeting with skills, knowledge or resources that you will be able to use immediately?

1. Yes
2. No

What was the most valuable part of the Regional Meeting?

What was the least valuable part?

What SHIP topics, settings/strategies, or skills would you like addressed in the future?